🔗 Share this article

Whenever a prominent honors show approaches, there’s always an outcry for the addition of new categories to acknowledge unsung work and satisfy the passions of enthusiasts dedicated to specific genres.

My colleague has already made advocating for terror-themed awards. That would rule. The same goes for tabletop games, which is someone's personal cause. However, I must insist for pushing forward since similar to blinkered fanatics, there's a strong justification backing this proposal is the most urgent above others. Here's the proposal: It's essential to create an award type for logic-based games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Organizing artistic expressions defies precise measurement; it’s very subjective, and inevitably start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. It's understandable that cinema institutions steer clear of genre categories. But it is a necessary evil in the world of video games, showing incredible range they hardly constitute a single creative category.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of achievement in video games to gain proper attention, and for games of all stripes to have a chance for representation, specific award classifications remain vital.

Existing Game Classification System

Leading game ceremonies currently feature award types recognizing Action, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Collectively, these classifications effectively encompass many game types, and you can find room for numerous titles.

This doesn't apply to puzzle games. There’s simply nowhere for their placement. Consider three of outstanding current releases, showing diverse approaches: the architectural riddles from a specific release, intense tile-matching from another release, thought-provoking social scenarios of a third title. What category would fit them within current classifications? Simply put, no category fits.

Recognition Challenges

Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers released every year without proper recognition at major award shows, unless they happen to qualify for categories like Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested Indie races.

• One classic puzzle game wasn’t nominated for anything during that awards season
• A different innovative game received no nominations during that ceremony
• Popular arranging title received no acknowledgment that year
• Just some puzzle games managed to sneak into independent or mobile categories

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're small games, however the design in brain-teasers is of massive significance. Well-known matching games rank among most popular titles in the world maintaining this status for an extended period.

The iconic tile-matching title competes with well-known building titles claiming status as most purchased experience; it also contends for top gaming experience. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks within interactive entertainment, and engaging with almost every other genre.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter such difficulty. One could readily select five nominees interesting, varied, worthy titles annually without trouble — actually, with challenge, given the need to exclude so many good games out.

And to reiterate, these are games lacking appropriate categories during prominent ceremonies. Logic title developers are working at the demanding boundary game development, developing some of essential manifestations of the video game form. Similar to film action specialists, they deserve recognition. We shouldn't delay decades.